Paying attention to the method of realizing the person information in imperative sentences, this study viewed that a subject could not be shown in an imperative sentence because the information shown in the subject could be replenished by other components in any methods. Thus, this study analyzed the person information shown in imperative sentences in the connection with personal pronoun, mood words in Chinese, and sentence concluding, and honorification in Korean, and also statistically analyzed the asymmetric aspect of person information in the subject part and predicate part between Korean and Chinese. Compared to Chinese, the personal pronouns were frequently omitted in the position of subject in Korean. In Korean, the person information was more realized through sentence-final ending and pre-final ending of predicate part, rather than personal pronoun. The asymmetric phenomenon of person information in imperative sentences between Korean and Chinese also shows differences when performing the interrelational meta-function. In Chinese imperative sentences, the intensity of order is regulated through the cross-use of personal pronouns such as ‘ni’ and ‘nin’, and the use of mood words. In Korean, however, many functions of order are performed by regulating the degree of honorification mainly through the speech level of sentence-final ending and pre-final ending ‘-si-’. To maintain the agreement of dialogue context in the comparative analysis, this study used a play work as quasi-spoken language data, and its translation. If this play work is translated into various languages, it would be easy to study various languages and also could be led to further researches in the future, which is a strength of this method.